SaaS won the last decade by being faster than building in-house. AI compressed that gap: a small team can stand up an internal app in days. Messy? Chaotic? Full of holes. Yes, but often good enough for the workflow that justified another subscription.
So is SaaS heading for a crisis? Not a sudden collapse — more a selective squeeze.
What AI changes about “buy vs build”
CRUD tools, internal dashboards, simple approval flows, and thin AI wrappers are cheaper to prototype than to evaluate five vendors. You skip seat negotiations and shape the UI around how your people already work.
Where SaaS still holds
Billing, identity, full CRM suites, compliance-heavy platforms, and products with years of edge cases. Rebuilding those “in a weekend” is a myth that dies in month three of maintenance.
What a crisis would actually look like
Not empty app stores — quieter expansion. Companies keep core SaaS and stop adding niche tools for every micro-problem. Vendors that only reskin a chat box feel it first; vendors that own hard infrastructure less so.
Related reading on this theme: building internal AI tools instead of another SaaS.
Build pressure also comes from building with no-code and low-code tools.
Buyers increasingly demand checking whether an AI investment really pays off before renewing seats.
SaaS is not dead. The default reflex of “there must be an app for that” is weaker when “we can wire one by Friday” is believable.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz